f22 program cost

F22 Program Cost - Copyright © 2023, Los Angeles Times | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy | CA Collection Notice | Do not sell or share my personal information

Delays, inefficiencies and cost overruns in the Air Force's F-22 fighter jet program highlight the Pentagon's procurement spree.

F22 Program Cost

Delays, inefficiencies and cost overruns in the Air Force's F-22 fighter jet program highlight the Pentagon's procurement spree.

The U.s. Wants To Decommission The F 22 Raptor To Free Up Budget For A Next Generation Fighter That Will Cost Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars

Despite its problems, the F-22 program cemented Lockheed's position as the world's leading fighter. (Lockheed Martin)

Delays, inefficiencies and cost overruns in the Air Force's F-22 fighter jet program highlight the Pentagon's procurement spree. By Ralph Vertavedian and W.J. the shenanigans

As the US seeks to reassure its Asian allies that it will defend them against threats from North Korea this spring, the Pentagon is deploying its top fighter jets, the F-22 Raptors.

A sign of American strength is the sobering reminder that America will have few spare F-22s. Alarmed by cost overruns, the Defense Department halted production last year after spending $67.3 billion on just 188 planes — leaving the Air Force to rely on a fleet of 30-year-old competitors.

F 22 Being Used To Test Next Generation Air Dominance 'fighter' Tech

"People around the world are not stupid," said House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard "Buck" McKeon (R-Santa Clarita). "They see what we have. They know our soldiers are gone."

Lockheed Martin Corp's F-22 is the deadliest fighter in the world. But it has also become a symbol of a broken procurement process that fails to deliver quality assets on time, on budget and in sufficient quantities.

The F-22 was originally intended to replace all of the Air Force's F-15s since the early 1970s. But today the F-15s still represent the majority of the air superiority fleet - planes that are supposed to attack enemy planes and gain control of the skies.

The system is completely broken and everyone knows it" - Sherman Mullin, retired former Lockheed F-22 project manager

Declassified: F 22 Raptor

The early withdrawal led directly to a new fighter jet, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter which Lockheed also developed. Today, the nearly $400 billion system is headed in the same direction as the F-22, behind schedule, facing major software problems and suffering from growth.

At the heart of the ongoing arms procurement crisis, retired military leaders and defense experts say, is a failure by the Pentagon and Congress to recognize at the outset the true cost and difficulty of building a machine like the F-22.

The military has issued high expectations based on low estimates of packages from contractors, critics say. Members of Congress, wanting to keep the money going to their home states, appropriated money for these important protections before the technology was even developed and tested.

When engineering problems cause costs to explode, Congress often steps in by cutting off the flow of money. Production was then reduced and the Pentagon sought lower-cost weapons. The vicious cycle begins again.

Usaf Withdraws F 22 Raptor From Future Plans

"If everyone involved were more honest and didn't lie about the risks, difficulties and costs, we wouldn't have this problem," said Thomas P. Christie, a retired civil servant who spent nearly 50 years at the Pentagon. "We jump into these decisions, and then wonder about the results."

The F-22 faced almost all of these problems. The Air Force began laying plans to build the F-22 in the early 1980s. A decade later, he estimated it would take nine years and $12.6 billion to build the plane, but it took 19 years and cost $26.3 billion, not including the plane. By the end of production, the F-22s had cost an average of $412 million each, compared to the original estimate of $149 million.

Airmen perform a hot refueling on an F-22 Raptor Nov. 15, 2012, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. (Technical Sergeant Dana Russo / US Air Force)

Airmen do hot fuel with an F-22 Raptor Nov. 15, 2012, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. (Tech Sgt. Dana Russo / US Air Force) Additional photos

The F 22 Stealth Fighter Has More Than One Weakness Compared To Modern Russian Warplanes

"The system is completely broken and everybody knows it," said Sherman Mullin, a retired former Lockheed director of the F-22 program and a staunch critic of the aircraft. "In part, the F-22 fell victim to that."

A Lockheed spokesman defended the program, saying that the plane is "the most important air combat aircraft in the world" and that the program provides the Pentagon with an adequate fleet.

Besides the cost, the complexity of the F-22 poses serious safety problems. He had seven major accidents, two of them fatal. A flaw in the F-22's new oxygen delivery system led to a three-month stay on the ground last year. A Lockheed spokesman said the problem has since been resolved with several improvements, and the flight ban was lifted in April. But the Defense Department's inspector general recently criticized the Air Force's investigation into the fatal accident involving oxygen.

The story of the F-22 began during the Cold War in Los Angeles, when the Air Force held a final competition between the two world leaders in stealth technology, Lockheed and Northrop Grumman Corp. Two companies design the prototypes - Lockheed YF-22 in Burbank and Northrop YF-23 in Hawthorne - and build them in Falldale.

F 22 Raptor To Be Removed From Action By 2030, Usaf Reveals

So much is riding on the competition that it is far beyond the performance of the aircraft. Northrop had already developed the secret B-2 Stealth bomber. If he had won the fighter competition, he would have filled the virtual role of the fighter jets of the Air Force. At the same time, Northrop's reputation was affected by various fraud investigations, putting Lockheed in a strong position to build political support in Congress.

We got the feeling they didn't care what the pilots thought," - Ron Johnston, Air Force YF-22 test pilot.

Northrop executives concluded they were being politically manipulated by Lockheed—which ended up having more than 1,000 subcontractors on the F-22 program with jobs in 44 countries, given the political ownership muscle Northrop lacked.

"I would go to the Pentagon by myself for a meeting and there would be 10 Lockheed people there," recalled Steve Smith, a retired Northrop executive who ran the airline. "You try to make an appointment and there will be three Lockheed people in front of you. We've already passed."

Jets Based On The Legendary F 22 That Never Made It Into The Air

The experts who managed this project tried to solve these problems, saying that both aircraft meet the needs of the service and provide the general senior staff with everything they want.

"If they decided to go out into the back yard of the White House and shoe horses to see who won, it wouldn't make any difference to the people who fought in the war," said Eric Abel, the senior soldier. The project engineer.

It was widely assumed that Northrop's approach was faster and more revealing, while Lockheed's approach was more efficient. But the real potential of the plane is close to no competition for any of the foreign officials. The service never allows a pilot to fly two planes.

"They don't want anyone to ask which pilot flies low which plane is better," said Conn Thosson, a former Air Force pilot on duty. "Leaders and politicians want to make the final choice. The last thing they want is some leader or leader who contradicts their decision."

Usaf Joining F 22s With F 35s To Maximize Its 5th Generation Capabilities

The Air Force held a competition between two models from the two leaders in the world in the field of stealth technology, Lockheed Martin Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp. See the breakdown »

Ron Johnston, another Air Force pilot in the program, said the YF-22 had a reputation at Edwards Air Force Base for being unreliable, but Air Force officers liked it. , which gave Lockheed more time when it was on schedule. "We get the impression that they don't care what the sailors think," he said.

The Air Force tested two planes in 1991 with 6 tons of classified information and a team of 250 experts. The final decision rested in the hands of then-Air Force Secretary Donald Rice, a former president of the Rand Corp., a nonprofit think tank in Santa Monica.

The day after Lockheed's victory, Rice denied that it was a better product and emphasized Lockheed's superior management of the project.

Even The U.s. Air Force Argued Against Building New F 22 Raptors

In a recent interview, Rice admitted that the F-22 is not a better plane, saying, "There is reason to think the YF-23 will be a better plane for the Air Force."

It wasn't concern about Northrop's monopoly or lack of political power that drove his decision, he said, although there was recognition from half the employees. Northrop retired that the competition was fake or bad.

Instead, Rice recalled, the company scored low on having to explain how its planes could be modified for the Navy, a measure that most recently when the Navy pulled out of the F-22 program entirely.

While it is impossible to tell whether Northrop's aircraft will have an advantage over the F-22, the extreme competition did not solve many problems that later became important for the F-22.

Why America Never Sold The F 22 Raptor To Foreign Countries

F22 vs f35 cost, f22 raptor program, program cost, f22 program, f22 raptor cost, f22 helmet cost, cost of f22 raptor, f22 raptor helmet cost, how much does a f22 cost, how much does a f22 raptor cost, f22 cost per plane, f22 cost